Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — imp pt/wk to ft3/ms
Convert Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per weeks = 3.318115e-11 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 9.395854e-10 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Imperial pint per Weeks and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = imperial pint per weeks × 3.318115e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per weeks equals 9.395854e-10 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per weeks-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 3.318115e-11.
Simple example
1 imp pt/wk × 3.318115e-11 = 3.318115e-11 ft3/ms
1 imperial pint per weeks = 3.318115e-11 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/wk × 3.318115e-11 = 1.990869e-9 ft3/ms
60 imperial pint per weeks = 1.990869e-9 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/wk | 3.318115e-12 ft3/ms |
| 1 imp pt/wk | 3.318115e-11 ft3/ms |
| 10 imp pt/wk | 3.318115e-10 ft3/ms |
| 60 imp pt/wk | 1.990869e-9 ft3/ms |
| 100 imp pt/wk | 3.318115e-9 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 imp pt/wk | 3.318115e-8 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Imperial pint per Weeks
3.318115e-11 ft3/ms × 30137597490 = 1.000000143 imp pt/wk
3.318115e-11 cubic feet per millisecond = 1.000000143 imperial pint per weeks.
imperial pint per weeks = cubic feet per millisecond × 30137597485
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Imperial pint per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 imperial pint per weeks?
1 imperial pint per weeks equals 3.318115e-11 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the imperial pint per weeks value by 3.318115e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to imperial pint per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 30,137,597,490 imperial pint per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per weeks?
Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per weeks and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.318115e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.