Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — pt/decade to cm3/h
Convert Pint per Decades (pt/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per decades = 0.0053979716 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.49943655e-12 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Pint per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = pint per decades × 0.00539797158737
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per decades equals 1.499437e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per decades-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 0.00539797158737.
Simple example
1 pt/decade × 0.005397971587 = 0.0053979716 cm3/h
1 pint per decades = 0.0053979716 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 pt/decade × 0.005397971587 = 0.3238782952 cm3/h
60 pint per decades = 0.3238782952 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Pint per Decades (pt/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/decade | 0.0005397972 cm3/h |
| 1 pt/decade | 0.0053979716 cm3/h |
| 10 pt/decade | 0.0539797159 cm3/h |
| 60 pt/decade | 0.3238782952 cm3/h |
| 100 pt/decade | 0.5397971587 cm3/h |
| 1,000 pt/decade | 5.397971587 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Pint per Decades
0.0053979716 cm3/h × 185.2547728 = 1.000000002 pt/decade
0.0053979716 cubic centimeter per hours = 1.000000002 pint per decades.
pint per decades = cubic centimeter per hours × 185.2547728
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Pint per Decades.
Understanding the Pint per Decades (pt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 pint per decades?
1 pint per decades equals 0.0053979716 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per decades to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the pint per decades value by 0.005397971587. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to pint per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 185.2547728 pint per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per decades?
Pint per Decades (pt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per decades to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per decades and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.005397971587 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.