Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes Converter — pt/decade to cm3/min
Convert Pint per Decades (pt/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per decades = 0.0000899662 cubic centimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.49943655e-12 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
Pint per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per minutes = pint per decades × 0.0000899661931228
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per decades equals 1.499437e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per decades-to-cubic centimeter per minutes factor of 0.0000899661931228.
Simple example
1 pt/decade × 0.00008996619312 = 0.0000899662 cm3/min
1 pint per decades = 0.0000899662 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 pt/decade × 0.00008996619312 = 0.0053979716 cm3/min
60 pint per decades = 0.0053979716 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Pint per Decades (pt/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/decade | 0.0000089966 cm3/min |
| 1 pt/decade | 0.0000899662 cm3/min |
| 10 pt/decade | 0.0008996619 cm3/min |
| 60 pt/decade | 0.0053979716 cm3/min |
| 100 pt/decade | 0.0089966193 cm3/min |
| 1,000 pt/decade | 0.0899661931 cm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Pint per Decades
0.0000899662 cm3/min × 11115.28637 = 1.000000076 pt/decade
0.0000899662 cubic centimeter per minutes = 1.000000076 pint per decades.
pint per decades = cubic centimeter per minutes × 11115.286368
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Pint per Decades.
Understanding the Pint per Decades (pt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per minutes are in 1 pint per decades?
1 pint per decades equals 0.0000899662 cubic centimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per decades to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Multiply the pint per decades value by 0.00008996619312. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes back to pint per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 11,115.28637 pint per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per decades?
Pint per Decades (pt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per decades to cubic centimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per decades and cubic centimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00008996619312 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.