Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — pt/decade to cm3/s
Convert Pint per Decades (pt/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per decades = 0.0000014994 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.49943655e-12 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Pint per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = pint per decades × 0.00000149943655205
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per decades equals 1.499437e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per decades-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.00000149943655205.
Simple example
1 pt/decade × 0.000001499436552 = 0.0000014994 cm3/s
1 pint per decades = 0.0000014994 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 pt/decade × 0.000001499436552 = 0.0000899662 cm3/s
60 pint per decades = 0.0000899662 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Pint per Decades (pt/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/decade | 1.499437e-7 cm3/s |
| 1 pt/decade | 0.0000014994 cm3/s |
| 10 pt/decade | 0.0000149944 cm3/s |
| 60 pt/decade | 0.0000899662 cm3/s |
| 100 pt/decade | 0.0001499437 cm3/s |
| 1,000 pt/decade | 0.0014994366 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Pint per Decades
0.0000014994 cm3/s × 666917.1821 = 0.9999756228 pt/decade
0.0000014994 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.9999756228 pint per decades.
pint per decades = cubic centimeter per seconds × 666917.182081
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Pint per Decades.
Understanding the Pint per Decades (pt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 pint per decades?
1 pint per decades equals 0.0000014994 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the pint per decades value by 0.000001499436552. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to pint per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 666,917.1821 pint per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per decades?
Pint per Decades (pt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per decades and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001499436552 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.