Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — pt/decade to mm3/s
Convert Pint per Decades (pt/decade) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per decades = 0.0014994366 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.49943655e-12 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Pint per Decades and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = pint per decades × 0.00149943655205
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per decades equals 1.499437e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per decades-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.00149943655205.
Simple example
1 pt/decade × 0.001499436552 = 0.0014994366 mm3/s
1 pint per decades = 0.0014994366 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 pt/decade × 0.001499436552 = 0.0899661931 mm3/s
60 pint per decades = 0.0899661931 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Pint per Decades (pt/decade) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/decade | 0.0001499437 mm3/s |
| 1 pt/decade | 0.0014994366 mm3/s |
| 10 pt/decade | 0.0149943655 mm3/s |
| 60 pt/decade | 0.0899661931 mm3/s |
| 100 pt/decade | 0.1499436552 mm3/s |
| 1,000 pt/decade | 1.499436552 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Pint per Decades
0.0014994366 mm3/s × 666.9171821 = 1.000000032 pt/decade
0.0014994366 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1.000000032 pint per decades.
pint per decades = cubic millimeter per seconds × 666.917182081
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Pint per Decades.
Understanding the Pint per Decades (pt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 pint per decades?
1 pint per decades equals 0.0014994366 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the pint per decades value by 0.001499436552. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to pint per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 666.9171821 pint per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per decades?
Pint per Decades (pt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per decades and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001499436552 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.