Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — pt/h to mm3/ms
Convert Pint per Hours (pt/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per hours = 0.1314379092 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.31437909e-7 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Pint per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = pint per hours × 0.131437909167
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per hours equals 1.314379e-7 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per hours-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.131437909167.
Simple example
1 pt/h × 0.1314379092 = 0.1314379092 mm3/ms
1 pint per hours = 0.1314379092 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 pt/h × 0.1314379092 = 7.88627455 mm3/ms
60 pint per hours = 7.88627455 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Pint per Hours (pt/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/h | 0.0131437909 mm3/ms |
| 1 pt/h | 0.1314379092 mm3/ms |
| 10 pt/h | 1.314379092 mm3/ms |
| 60 pt/h | 7.88627455 mm3/ms |
| 100 pt/h | 13.14379092 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 pt/h | 131.4379092 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Hours
0.1314379092 mm3/ms × 7.608155108 = 1 pt/h
0.1314379092 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1 pint per hours.
pint per hours = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 7.60815510791
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Hours.
Understanding the Pint per Hours (pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 pint per hours?
1 pint per hours equals 0.1314379092 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per hours to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the pint per hours value by 0.1314379092. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to pint per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 7.608155108 pint per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per hours?
Pint per Hours (pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per hours to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per hours and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1314379092 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.