Volumetric flow rate.
Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — pt/ms to m3/ms
Convert Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per millisecond = 0.0004731765 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.473176473 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Pint per Millisecond and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = pints per millisecond × 0.000473176473
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per millisecond equals 0.473176473 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per millisecond-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 0.000473176473.
Simple example
1 pt/ms × 0.000473176473 = 0.0004731765 m3/ms
1 pint per millisecond = 0.0004731765 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 pt/ms × 0.000473176473 = 0.0283905884 m3/ms
60 pints per millisecond = 0.0283905884 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/ms | 0.0000473176 m3/ms |
| 1 pt/ms | 0.0004731765 m3/ms |
| 10 pt/ms | 0.0047317647 m3/ms |
| 60 pt/ms | 0.0283905884 m3/ms |
| 100 pt/ms | 0.0473176473 m3/ms |
| 1,000 pt/ms | 0.473176473 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Pint per Millisecond
0.0004731765 m3/ms × 2113.376419 = 1.000000057 pt/ms
0.0004731765 cubic meters per millisecond = 1.000000057 pints per millisecond.
pints per millisecond = cubic meters per millisecond × 2113.37641887
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Pint per Millisecond.
Understanding the Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 pint per millisecond?
1 pint per millisecond equals 0.0004731765 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per millisecond to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the pint per millisecond value by 0.000473176473. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to pint per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 2,113.376419 pints per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per millisecond?
Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per millisecond to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per millisecond and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000473176473 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.