Volumetric flow rate.
Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — pt/ms to mm3/h
Convert Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per millisecond = 1.703435e+12 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.473176473 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Pint per Millisecond and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = pints per millisecond × 1.703435e+12
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per millisecond equals 0.473176473 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per millisecond-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 1.703435e+12.
Simple example
1 pt/ms × 1.703435e+12 = 1.703435e+12 mm3/h
1 pint per millisecond = 1.703435e+12 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 pt/ms × 1.703435e+12 = 1.022061e+14 mm3/h
60 pints per millisecond = 1.022061e+14 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/ms | 170,343,530,300 mm3/h |
| 1 pt/ms | 1.703435e+12 mm3/h |
| 10 pt/ms | 1.703435e+13 mm3/h |
| 60 pt/ms | 1.022061e+14 mm3/h |
| 100 pt/ms | 1.703435e+14 mm3/h |
| 1,000 pt/ms | 1.703435e+15 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Pint per Millisecond
1.703435e+12 mm3/h × 5.87049e-13 = 0.9999998222 pt/ms
1.703435e+12 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.9999998222 pints per millisecond.
pints per millisecond = cubic millimeter per hours × 5.87049e-13
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Pint per Millisecond.
Understanding the Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 pint per millisecond?
1 pint per millisecond equals 1.703435e+12 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per millisecond to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the pint per millisecond value by 1.703435e+12. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to pint per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 5.87049e-13 pints per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per millisecond?
Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per millisecond to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per millisecond and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.703435e+12 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.