Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Seconds to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — pt/s to mm3/ms
Convert Pint per Seconds (pt/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per seconds = 473.176473 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Seconds to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.000473176473 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Seconds to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Pint per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = pint per seconds × 473.176473
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per seconds equals 0.000473176473 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 473.176473.
Simple example
1 pt/s × 473.176473 = 473.176473 mm3/ms
1 pint per seconds = 473.176473 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 pt/s × 473.176473 = 28,390.58838 mm3/ms
60 pint per seconds = 28,390.58838 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Pint per Seconds (pt/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/s | 47.3176473 mm3/ms |
| 1 pt/s | 473.176473 mm3/ms |
| 10 pt/s | 4,731.76473 mm3/ms |
| 60 pt/s | 28,390.58838 mm3/ms |
| 100 pt/s | 47,317.6473 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 pt/s | 473,176.473 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Seconds
473.176473 mm3/ms × 0.002113376419 = 1 pt/s
473.176473 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1 pint per seconds.
pint per seconds = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 0.00211337641887
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Seconds.
Understanding the Pint per Seconds (pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 pint per seconds?
1 pint per seconds equals 473.176473 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per seconds to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the pint per seconds value by 473.176473. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to pint per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.0021133764 pint per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per seconds?
Pint per Seconds (pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per seconds to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per seconds and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 473.176473 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.