Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — pt/wk to mm3/ms
Convert Pint per Weeks (pt/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per weeks = 0.0007823685 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.82368507e-10 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Pint per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = pint per weeks × 0.000782368506944
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per weeks equals 7.823685e-10 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.000782368506944.
Simple example
1 pt/wk × 0.0007823685069 = 0.0007823685 mm3/ms
1 pint per weeks = 0.0007823685 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 pt/wk × 0.0007823685069 = 0.0469421104 mm3/ms
60 pint per weeks = 0.0469421104 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Pint per Weeks (pt/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/wk | 0.0000782369 mm3/ms |
| 1 pt/wk | 0.0007823685 mm3/ms |
| 10 pt/wk | 0.0078236851 mm3/ms |
| 60 pt/wk | 0.0469421104 mm3/ms |
| 100 pt/wk | 0.0782368507 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 pt/wk | 0.7823685069 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Weeks
0.0007823685 mm3/ms × 1278.170058 = 0.9999999911 pt/wk
0.0007823685 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 0.9999999911 pint per weeks.
pint per weeks = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 1278.17005813
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Weeks.
Understanding the Pint per Weeks (pt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 pint per weeks?
1 pint per weeks equals 0.0007823685 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the pint per weeks value by 0.0007823685069. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to pint per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 1,278.170058 pint per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per weeks?
Pint per Weeks (pt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per weeks and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0007823685069 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.