Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Weeks to Imperial gallons per Millisecond Converter — pt/wk to imp gal/ms
Convert Pint per Weeks (pt/wk) to Imperial gallon per Millisecond (imp gal/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per weeks = 1.72097e-10 imperial gallon per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Weeks to Imperial gallons per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.82368507e-10 / 4.54609.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Weeks to Imperial gallons per Millisecond
Pint per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallons per millisecond = pint per weeks × 1.72097e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per weeks equals 7.823685e-10 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per millisecond equals 4.54609 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per weeks-to-imperial gallon per millisecond factor of 1.72097e-10.
Simple example
1 pt/wk × 1.72097e-10 = 1.72097e-10 imp gal/ms
1 pint per weeks = 1.72097e-10 imperial gallons per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 pt/wk × 1.72097e-10 = 1.032582e-8 imp gal/ms
60 pint per weeks = 1.032582e-8 imperial gallons per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Pint per Weeks (pt/wk) | Imperial gallon per Millisecond (imp gal/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/wk | 1.72097e-11 imp gal/ms |
| 1 pt/wk | 1.72097e-10 imp gal/ms |
| 10 pt/wk | 1.72097e-9 imp gal/ms |
| 60 pt/wk | 1.032582e-8 imp gal/ms |
| 100 pt/wk | 1.72097e-8 imp gal/ms |
| 1,000 pt/wk | 1.72097e-7 imp gal/ms |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Millisecond to Pint per Weeks
1.72097e-10 imp gal/ms × 5810676120 = 0.9999999281 pt/wk
1.72097e-10 imperial gallons per millisecond = 0.9999999281 pint per weeks.
pint per weeks = imperial gallons per millisecond × 5810676119.56
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Millisecond to Pint per Weeks.
Understanding the Pint per Weeks (pt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Millisecond (imp gal/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallons per millisecond are in 1 pint per weeks?
1 pint per weeks equals 1.72097e-10 imperial gallons per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per weeks to imperial gallon per millisecond?
Multiply the pint per weeks value by 1.72097e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per millisecond back to pint per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per millisecond equals 5,810,676,120 pint per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per weeks?
Pint per Weeks (pt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per millisecond?
Imperial gallon per Millisecond (imp gal/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per weeks to imperial gallon per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per weeks and imperial gallon per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.72097e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.