Volumetric flow rate.
Pint per Years to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — pt/yr to mm3/ms
Convert Pint per Years (pt/yr) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per years = 0.0000149944 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pint per Years to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.49943655e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pint per Years to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Pint per Years and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = pint per years × 0.0000149943655205
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per years equals 1.499437e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per years-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.0000149943655205.
Simple example
1 pt/yr × 0.00001499436552 = 0.0000149944 mm3/ms
1 pint per years = 0.0000149944 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 pt/yr × 0.00001499436552 = 0.0008996619 mm3/ms
60 pint per years = 0.0008996619 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Pint per Years (pt/yr) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/yr | 0.0000014994 mm3/ms |
| 1 pt/yr | 0.0000149944 mm3/ms |
| 10 pt/yr | 0.0001499437 mm3/ms |
| 60 pt/yr | 0.0008996619 mm3/ms |
| 100 pt/yr | 0.0014994366 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 pt/yr | 0.0149943655 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Years
0.0000149944 mm3/ms × 66691.71821 = 1.000002299 pt/yr
0.0000149944 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1.000002299 pint per years.
pint per years = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 66691.7182081
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Pint per Years.
Understanding the Pint per Years (pt/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 pint per years?
1 pint per years equals 0.0000149944 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per years to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the pint per years value by 0.00001499436552. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to pint per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 66,691.71821 pint per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per years?
Pint per Years (pt/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per years to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per years and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001499436552 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.