Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — imp qt/d to cm3/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per days = 7,955.6575 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.31541956e-8 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Imperial quart per Days and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = imperial quart per days × 7955.6575
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per days equals 1.31542e-8 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per days-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 7955.6575.
Simple example
1 imp qt/d × 7955.6575 = 7,955.6575 cm3/wk
1 imperial quart per days = 7,955.6575 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/d × 7955.6575 = 477,339.45 cm3/wk
60 imperial quart per days = 477,339.45 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/d | 795.56575 cm3/wk |
| 1 imp qt/d | 7,955.6575 cm3/wk |
| 10 imp qt/d | 79,556.575 cm3/wk |
| 60 imp qt/d | 477,339.45 cm3/wk |
| 100 imp qt/d | 795,565.75 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/d | 7,955,657.5 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Days
1 cm3/wk × 0.0001256967133 = 0.0001256967 imp qt/d
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0001256967 imperial quart per days.
imperial quart per days = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.000125696713314
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Days.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per days?
1 imperial quart per days equals 7,955.6575 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per days to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per days value by 7955.6575. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to imperial quart per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0001256967 imperial quart per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per days?
Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per days to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per days and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 7955.6575 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.