Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — imp qt/d to m3/ms
Convert Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per days = 1.31542e-11 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.31541956e-8 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Imperial quart per Days and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = imperial quart per days × 1.31542e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per days equals 1.31542e-8 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per days-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 1.31542e-11.
Simple example
1 imp qt/d × 1.31542e-11 = 1.31542e-11 m3/ms
1 imperial quart per days = 1.31542e-11 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/d × 1.31542e-11 = 7.892517e-10 m3/ms
60 imperial quart per days = 7.892517e-10 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/d | 1.31542e-12 m3/ms |
| 1 imp qt/d | 1.31542e-11 m3/ms |
| 10 imp qt/d | 1.31542e-10 m3/ms |
| 60 imp qt/d | 7.892517e-10 m3/ms |
| 100 imp qt/d | 1.31542e-9 m3/ms |
| 1,000 imp qt/d | 1.31542e-8 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Days
1.31542e-11 m3/ms × 76021372210 = 1.000000334 imp qt/d
1.31542e-11 cubic meters per millisecond = 1.000000334 imperial quart per days.
imperial quart per days = cubic meters per millisecond × 76021372212.2
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Days.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 imperial quart per days?
1 imperial quart per days equals 1.31542e-11 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per days to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the imperial quart per days value by 1.31542e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to imperial quart per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 76,021,372,210 imperial quart per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per days?
Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per days to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per days and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.31542e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.