Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quarts per Fortnight to Bushel per Hours Converter — imp qt/fn to bu/h
Convert Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) to Bushel per Hours (bu/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per fortnight = 0.0000959874 bushel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quarts per Fortnight to Bushel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 9.395854e-10 / 9.7886306e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quarts per Fortnight to Bushel per Hours
Imperial quart per Fortnight and Bushel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per hours = imperial quarts per fortnight × 0.0000959874203394
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per fortnight equals 9.395854e-10 base units, and 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per fortnight-to-bushel per hours factor of 0.0000959874203394.
Simple example
1 imp qt/fn × 0.00009598742034 = 0.0000959874 bu/h
1 imperial quart per fortnight = 0.0000959874 bushel per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/fn × 0.00009598742034 = 0.0057592452 bu/h
60 imperial quarts per fortnight = 0.0057592452 bushel per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) | Bushel per Hours (bu/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/fn | 0.0000095987 bu/h |
| 1 imp qt/fn | 0.0000959874 bu/h |
| 10 imp qt/fn | 0.0009598742 bu/h |
| 60 imp qt/fn | 0.0057592452 bu/h |
| 100 imp qt/fn | 0.009598742 bu/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/fn | 0.0959874203 bu/h |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Hours to Imperial quart per Fortnight
0.0000959874 bu/h × 10418.03183 = 0.9999997881 imp qt/fn
0.0000959874 bushel per hours = 0.9999997881 imperial quarts per fortnight.
imperial quarts per fortnight = bushel per hours × 10418.0318261
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Hours to Imperial quart per Fortnight.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per hours are in 1 imperial quart per fortnight?
1 imperial quart per fortnight equals 0.0000959874 bushel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per fortnight to bushel per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per fortnight value by 0.00009598742034. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per hours back to imperial quart per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per hours equals 10,418.03183 imperial quarts per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per fortnight?
Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per fortnight to bushel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per fortnight and bushel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00009598742034 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.