Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic foot per Months Converter — imp qt/h to ft3/mo
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Cubic foot per Months (ft3/mo) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 29.31868263 cubic foot per months). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic foot per Months converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 1.07679018e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic foot per Months
Imperial quart per Hours and Cubic foot per Months both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per months = imperial quart per hours × 29.3186826335
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 cubic foot per months equals 1.07679e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-cubic foot per months factor of 29.3186826335.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 29.31868263 = 29.31868263 ft3/mo
1 imperial quart per hours = 29.31868263 cubic foot per months.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 29.31868263 = 1,759.120958 ft3/mo
60 imperial quart per hours = 1,759.120958 cubic foot per months.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Cubic foot per Months (ft3/mo) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 2.931868263 ft3/mo |
| 1 imp qt/h | 29.31868263 ft3/mo |
| 10 imp qt/h | 293.1868263 ft3/mo |
| 60 imp qt/h | 1,759.120958 ft3/mo |
| 100 imp qt/h | 2,931.868263 ft3/mo |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 29,318.68263 ft3/mo |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Months to Imperial quart per Hours
29.31868263 ft3/mo × 0.0341079445 = 0.9999999999 imp qt/h
29.31868263 cubic foot per months = 0.9999999999 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = cubic foot per months × 0.0341079444974
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Months to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Months (ft3/mo)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per months are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 29.31868263 cubic foot per months, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to cubic foot per months?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 29.31868263. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per months back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per months equals 0.0341079445 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per months?
Cubic foot per Months (ft3/mo) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to cubic foot per months conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and cubic foot per months are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29.31868263 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.