Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — imp qt/h to ft3/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 6.742833436 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks
Imperial quart per Hours and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 6.74283343591
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 6.74283343591.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 6.742833436 = 6.742833436 ft3/wk
1 imperial quart per hours = 6.742833436 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 6.742833436 = 404.5700062 ft3/wk
60 imperial quart per hours = 404.5700062 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 0.6742833436 ft3/wk |
| 1 imp qt/h | 6.742833436 ft3/wk |
| 10 imp qt/h | 67.42833436 ft3/wk |
| 60 imp qt/h | 404.5700062 ft3/wk |
| 100 imp qt/h | 674.2833436 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 6,742.833436 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
6.742833436 ft3/wk × 0.1483056062 = 1 imp qt/h
6.742833436 cubic foot per weeks = 1 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = cubic foot per weeks × 0.148305606168
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 6.742833436 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 6.742833436. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.1483056062 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6.742833436 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.