Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic yard per Years Converter — imp qt/h to yd3/yr
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 13.03052561 cubic yard per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic yard per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 2.4227779e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic yard per Years
Imperial quart per Hours and Cubic yard per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per years = imperial quart per hours × 13.0305256149
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 cubic yard per years equals 2.422778e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-cubic yard per years factor of 13.0305256149.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 13.03052561 = 13.03052561 yd3/yr
1 imperial quart per hours = 13.03052561 cubic yard per years.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 13.03052561 = 781.8315369 yd3/yr
60 imperial quart per hours = 781.8315369 cubic yard per years.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 1.303052561 yd3/yr |
| 1 imp qt/h | 13.03052561 yd3/yr |
| 10 imp qt/h | 130.3052561 yd3/yr |
| 60 imp qt/h | 781.8315369 yd3/yr |
| 100 imp qt/h | 1,303.052561 yd3/yr |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 13,030.52561 yd3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Years to Imperial quart per Hours
13.03052561 yd3/yr × 0.07674287512 = 0.9999999996 imp qt/h
13.03052561 cubic yard per years = 0.9999999996 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = cubic yard per years × 0.0767428751191
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Years to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per years are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 13.03052561 cubic yard per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to cubic yard per years?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 13.03052561. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per years back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per years equals 0.0767428751 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per years?
Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to cubic yard per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and cubic yard per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 13.03052561 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.