Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks Converter — imp qt/h to metric cup/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 763.74312 metric cup per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 4.13359788e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks
Imperial quart per Hours and Metric cup per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 763.74312
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 metric cup per weeks equals 4.133598e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-metric cup per weeks factor of 763.74312.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 763.74312 = 763.74312 metric cup/wk
1 imperial quart per hours = 763.74312 metric cup per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 763.74312 = 45,824.5872 metric cup/wk
60 imperial quart per hours = 45,824.5872 metric cup per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 76.374312 metric cup/wk |
| 1 imp qt/h | 763.74312 metric cup/wk |
| 10 imp qt/h | 7,637.4312 metric cup/wk |
| 60 imp qt/h | 45,824.5872 metric cup/wk |
| 100 imp qt/h | 76,374.312 metric cup/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 763,743.12 metric cup/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
763.74312 metric cup/wk × 0.001309340764 = 1 imp qt/h
763.74312 metric cup per weeks = 1 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = metric cup per weeks × 0.00130934076369
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 763.74312 metric cup per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to metric cup per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 763.74312. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per weeks back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per weeks equals 0.0013093408 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per weeks?
Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to metric cup per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and metric cup per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 763.74312 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.