Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Microliter per Seconds Converter — imp qt/h to uL/s
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 315.7006944 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Microliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Microliter per Seconds
Imperial quart per Hours and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per seconds = imperial quart per hours × 315.700694444
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-microliter per seconds factor of 315.700694444.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 315.7006944 = 315.7006944 uL/s
1 imperial quart per hours = 315.7006944 microliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 315.7006944 = 18,942.04167 uL/s
60 imperial quart per hours = 18,942.04167 microliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 31.57006944 uL/s |
| 1 imp qt/h | 315.7006944 uL/s |
| 10 imp qt/h | 3,157.006944 uL/s |
| 60 imp qt/h | 18,942.04167 uL/s |
| 100 imp qt/h | 31,570.06944 uL/s |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 315,700.6944 uL/s |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours
315.7006944 uL/s × 0.003167557176 = 0.9999999999 imp qt/h
315.7006944 microliter per seconds = 0.9999999999 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = microliter per seconds × 0.00316755717551
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per seconds are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 315.7006944 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to microliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 315.7006944. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per seconds back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 0.0031675572 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per seconds?
Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to microliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 315.7006944 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.