Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes Converter — imp qt/ms to bu/min
Convert Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) to Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per millisecond = 1,935.106394 bushel per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.1365225 / 0.0005873178361.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
Imperial quart per Millisecond and Bushel per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per minutes = imperial quarts per millisecond × 1935.10639404
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, and 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per millisecond-to-bushel per minutes factor of 1935.10639404.
Simple example
1 imp qt/ms × 1935.106394 = 1,935.106394 bu/min
1 imperial quart per millisecond = 1,935.106394 bushel per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/ms × 1935.106394 = 116,106.3836 bu/min
60 imperial quarts per millisecond = 116,106.3836 bushel per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) | Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/ms | 193.5106394 bu/min |
| 1 imp qt/ms | 1,935.106394 bu/min |
| 10 imp qt/ms | 19,351.06394 bu/min |
| 60 imp qt/ms | 116,106.3836 bu/min |
| 100 imp qt/ms | 193,510.6394 bu/min |
| 1,000 imp qt/ms | 1,935,106.394 bu/min |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Millisecond
1 bu/min × 0.0005167674517 = 0.0005167675 imp qt/ms
1 bushel per minutes = 0.0005167675 imperial quarts per millisecond.
imperial quarts per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.000516767451691
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Millisecond.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per minutes are in 1 imperial quart per millisecond?
1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1,935.106394 bushel per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond to bushel per minutes?
Multiply the imperial quart per millisecond value by 1935.106394. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per minutes back to imperial quart per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0005167675 imperial quarts per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per millisecond to bushel per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per millisecond and bushel per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1935.106394 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.