Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds Converter — imp qt/ms to hL/s
Convert Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) to Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per millisecond = 11.365225 hectoliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.1365225 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds
Imperial quart per Millisecond and Hectoliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliter per seconds = imperial quarts per millisecond × 11.365225
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, and 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per millisecond-to-hectoliter per seconds factor of 11.365225.
Simple example
1 imp qt/ms × 11.365225 = 11.365225 hL/s
1 imperial quart per millisecond = 11.365225 hectoliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/ms × 11.365225 = 681.9135 hL/s
60 imperial quarts per millisecond = 681.9135 hectoliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) | Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/ms | 1.1365225 hL/s |
| 1 imp qt/ms | 11.365225 hL/s |
| 10 imp qt/ms | 113.65225 hL/s |
| 60 imp qt/ms | 681.9135 hL/s |
| 100 imp qt/ms | 1,136.5225 hL/s |
| 1,000 imp qt/ms | 11,365.225 hL/s |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Millisecond
11.365225 hL/s × 0.08798769932 = 1 imp qt/ms
11.365225 hectoliter per seconds = 1 imperial quarts per millisecond.
imperial quarts per millisecond = hectoliter per seconds × 0.0879876993196
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Millisecond.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliter per seconds are in 1 imperial quart per millisecond?
1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 11.365225 hectoliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond to hectoliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial quart per millisecond value by 11.365225. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per seconds back to imperial quart per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.0879876993 imperial quarts per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per seconds?
Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per millisecond to hectoliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per millisecond and hectoliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 11.365225 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.