Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Minutes to Centiliter per Hours Converter — imp qt/min to cL/h
Convert Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) to Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per minutes = 6,819.135 centiliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Minutes to Centiliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.89420417e-5 / 2.77777778e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Minutes to Centiliter per Hours
Imperial quart per Minutes and Centiliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per hours = imperial quart per minutes × 6819.135
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0000189420416667 base units, and 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per minutes-to-centiliter per hours factor of 6819.135.
Simple example
1 imp qt/min × 6819.135 = 6,819.135 cL/h
1 imperial quart per minutes = 6,819.135 centiliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/min × 6819.135 = 409,148.1 cL/h
60 imperial quart per minutes = 409,148.1 centiliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) | Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/min | 681.9135 cL/h |
| 1 imp qt/min | 6,819.135 cL/h |
| 10 imp qt/min | 68,191.35 cL/h |
| 60 imp qt/min | 409,148.1 cL/h |
| 100 imp qt/min | 681,913.5 cL/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/min | 6,819,135 cL/h |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Minutes
1 cL/h × 0.0001466461655 = 0.0001466462 imp qt/min
1 centiliter per hours = 0.0001466462 imperial quart per minutes.
imperial quart per minutes = centiliter per hours × 0.000146646165533
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Minutes.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per hours are in 1 imperial quart per minutes?
1 imperial quart per minutes equals 6,819.135 centiliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per minutes to centiliter per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per minutes value by 6819.135. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per hours back to imperial quart per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per hours equals 0.0001466462 imperial quart per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per minutes?
Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per minutes to centiliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per minutes and centiliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6819.135 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.