Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Minutes to Megaliter per Weeks Converter — imp qt/min to ML/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) to Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per minutes = 0.0114561468 megaliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Minutes to Megaliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.89420417e-5 / 0.001653439153.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Minutes to Megaliter per Weeks
Imperial quart per Minutes and Megaliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliter per weeks = imperial quart per minutes × 0.0114561468
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0000189420416667 base units, and 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per minutes-to-megaliter per weeks factor of 0.0114561468.
Simple example
1 imp qt/min × 0.0114561468 = 0.0114561468 ML/wk
1 imperial quart per minutes = 0.0114561468 megaliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/min × 0.0114561468 = 0.687368808 ML/wk
60 imperial quart per minutes = 0.687368808 megaliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) | Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/min | 0.0011456147 ML/wk |
| 1 imp qt/min | 0.0114561468 ML/wk |
| 10 imp qt/min | 0.114561468 ML/wk |
| 60 imp qt/min | 0.687368808 ML/wk |
| 100 imp qt/min | 1.14561468 ML/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/min | 11.4561468 ML/wk |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes
0.0114561468 ML/wk × 87.28938425 = 1 imp qt/min
0.0114561468 megaliter per weeks = 1 imperial quart per minutes.
imperial quart per minutes = megaliter per weeks × 87.2893842457
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliter per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per minutes?
1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0114561468 megaliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per minutes to megaliter per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per minutes value by 0.0114561468. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks back to imperial quart per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 87.28938425 imperial quart per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per minutes?
Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per minutes to megaliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per minutes and megaliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0114561468 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.