Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushels per Fortnight Converter — imp qt/s to bu/fn
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 39,011.7449 bushel per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushels per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 2.91328292e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushels per Fortnight
Imperial quart per Seconds and Bushel per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per fortnight = imperial quart per seconds × 39011.7449039
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 bushel per fortnight equals 2.913283e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-bushel per fortnight factor of 39011.7449039.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 39011.7449 = 39,011.7449 bu/fn
1 imperial quart per seconds = 39,011.7449 bushels per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 39011.7449 = 2,340,704.694 bu/fn
60 imperial quart per seconds = 2,340,704.694 bushels per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 3,901.17449 bu/fn |
| 1 imp qt/s | 39,011.7449 bu/fn |
| 10 imp qt/s | 390,117.449 bu/fn |
| 60 imp qt/s | 2,340,704.694 bu/fn |
| 100 imp qt/s | 3,901,174.49 bu/fn |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 39,011,744.9 bu/fn |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds
1 bu/fn × 0.00002563330614 = 0.0000256333 imp qt/s
1 bushel per fortnight = 0.0000256333 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = bushels per fortnight × 0.0000256333061355
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per fortnight are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 39,011.7449 bushels per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to bushel per fortnight?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 39011.7449. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per fortnight back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per fortnight equals 0.0000256333 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per fortnight?
Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to bushel per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and bushel per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 39011.7449 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.