Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — imp qt/s to cL/min
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 6,819.135 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Centiliter per Minutes
Imperial quart per Seconds and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = imperial quart per seconds × 6819.135
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 6819.135.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 6819.135 = 6,819.135 cL/min
1 imperial quart per seconds = 6,819.135 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 6819.135 = 409,148.1 cL/min
60 imperial quart per seconds = 409,148.1 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 681.9135 cL/min |
| 1 imp qt/s | 6,819.135 cL/min |
| 10 imp qt/s | 68,191.35 cL/min |
| 60 imp qt/s | 409,148.1 cL/min |
| 100 imp qt/s | 681,913.5 cL/min |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 6,819,135 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Seconds
1 cL/min × 0.0001466461655 = 0.0001466462 imp qt/s
1 centiliter per minutes = 0.0001466462 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = centiliter per minutes × 0.000146646165533
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 6,819.135 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 6819.135. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 0.0001466462 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6819.135 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.