Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic foot per Years Converter — imp qt/s to ft3/yr
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 1,266,567.09 cubic foot per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic foot per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 8.97325147e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic foot per Years
Imperial quart per Seconds and Cubic foot per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per years = imperial quart per seconds × 1266567.08977
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 cubic foot per years equals 8.973251e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-cubic foot per years factor of 1266567.08977.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 1266567.09 = 1,266,567.09 ft3/yr
1 imperial quart per seconds = 1,266,567.09 cubic foot per years.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 1266567.09 = 75,994,025.39 ft3/yr
60 imperial quart per seconds = 75,994,025.39 cubic foot per years.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 126,656.709 ft3/yr |
| 1 imp qt/s | 1,266,567.09 ft3/yr |
| 10 imp qt/s | 12,665,670.9 ft3/yr |
| 60 imp qt/s | 75,994,025.39 ft3/yr |
| 100 imp qt/s | 126,656,709 ft3/yr |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 1,266,567,090 ft3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Years to Imperial quart per Seconds
1 ft3/yr × 7.895358e-7 = 7.895358e-7 imp qt/s
1 cubic foot per years = 7.895358e-7 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = cubic foot per years × 7.895358e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Years to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per years are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 1,266,567.09 cubic foot per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to cubic foot per years?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 1266567.09. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per years back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per years equals 7.895358e-7 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per years?
Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to cubic foot per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and cubic foot per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1266567.09 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.