Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic yard per Weeks Converter — imp qt/s to yd3/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 899.0444581 cubic yard per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic yard per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 1.26414494e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic yard per Weeks
Imperial quart per Seconds and Cubic yard per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 899.044458121
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 0.00000126414493714 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-cubic yard per weeks factor of 899.044458121.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 899.0444581 = 899.0444581 yd3/wk
1 imperial quart per seconds = 899.0444581 cubic yard per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 899.0444581 = 53,942.66749 yd3/wk
60 imperial quart per seconds = 53,942.66749 cubic yard per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 89.90444581 yd3/wk |
| 1 imp qt/s | 899.0444581 yd3/wk |
| 10 imp qt/s | 8,990.444581 yd3/wk |
| 60 imp qt/s | 53,942.66749 yd3/wk |
| 100 imp qt/s | 89,904.44581 yd3/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 899,044.4581 yd3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
899.0444581 yd3/wk × 0.001112292046 = 1 imp qt/s
899.0444581 cubic yard per weeks = 1 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = cubic yard per weeks × 0.00111229204626
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 899.0444581 cubic yard per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to cubic yard per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 899.0444581. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per weeks back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 0.001112292 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per weeks?
Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to cubic yard per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and cubic yard per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 899.0444581 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.