Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Hectoliter per Minutes Converter — imp qt/s to hL/min
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 0.6819135 hectoliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Hectoliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 0.001666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Hectoliter per Minutes
Imperial quart per Seconds and Hectoliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliter per minutes = imperial quart per seconds × 0.6819135
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-hectoliter per minutes factor of 0.6819135.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 0.6819135 = 0.6819135 hL/min
1 imperial quart per seconds = 0.6819135 hectoliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 0.6819135 = 40.91481 hL/min
60 imperial quart per seconds = 40.91481 hectoliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 0.06819135 hL/min |
| 1 imp qt/s | 0.6819135 hL/min |
| 10 imp qt/s | 6.819135 hL/min |
| 60 imp qt/s | 40.91481 hL/min |
| 100 imp qt/s | 68.19135 hL/min |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 681.9135 hL/min |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Seconds
0.6819135 hL/min × 1.466461655 = 1 imp qt/s
0.6819135 hectoliter per minutes = 1 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = hectoliter per minutes × 1.46646165533
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliter per minutes are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.6819135 hectoliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to hectoliter per minutes?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 0.6819135. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 1.466461655 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to hectoliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and hectoliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.6819135 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.