Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks Converter — imp qt/s to ML/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 0.687368808 megaliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 0.001653439153.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks
Imperial quart per Seconds and Megaliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliter per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 0.687368808
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-megaliter per weeks factor of 0.687368808.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 0.687368808 = 0.687368808 ML/wk
1 imperial quart per seconds = 0.687368808 megaliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 0.687368808 = 41.24212848 ML/wk
60 imperial quart per seconds = 41.24212848 megaliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 0.0687368808 ML/wk |
| 1 imp qt/s | 0.687368808 ML/wk |
| 10 imp qt/s | 6.87368808 ML/wk |
| 60 imp qt/s | 41.24212848 ML/wk |
| 100 imp qt/s | 68.7368808 ML/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 687.368808 ML/wk |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
0.687368808 ML/wk × 1.454823071 = 1 imp qt/s
0.687368808 megaliter per weeks = 1 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = megaliter per weeks × 1.45482307076
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliter per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.687368808 megaliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to megaliter per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 0.687368808. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 1.454823071 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to megaliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and megaliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.687368808 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.