Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Microliter per Seconds Converter — imp qt/s to uL/s
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 1,136,522.5 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Microliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Microliter per Seconds
Imperial quart per Seconds and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per seconds = imperial quart per seconds × 1136522.5
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-microliter per seconds factor of 1136522.5.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 1136522.5 = 1,136,522.5 uL/s
1 imperial quart per seconds = 1,136,522.5 microliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 1136522.5 = 68,191,350 uL/s
60 imperial quart per seconds = 68,191,350 microliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 113,652.25 uL/s |
| 1 imp qt/s | 1,136,522.5 uL/s |
| 10 imp qt/s | 11,365,225 uL/s |
| 60 imp qt/s | 68,191,350 uL/s |
| 100 imp qt/s | 113,652,250 uL/s |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 1,136,522,500 uL/s |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Seconds
1 uL/s × 8.79877e-7 = 8.79877e-7 imp qt/s
1 microliter per seconds = 8.79877e-7 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = microliter per seconds × 8.79877e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per seconds are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 1,136,522.5 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to microliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 1136522.5. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per seconds back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 8.79877e-7 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per seconds?
Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to microliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1136522.5 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.