Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Hours Converter — imp qt/wk to cL/h
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.6765014881 centiliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 2.77777778e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Hours
Imperial quart per Weeks and Centiliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 0.676501488095
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-centiliter per hours factor of 0.676501488095.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 0.6765014881 = 0.6765014881 cL/h
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.6765014881 centiliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 0.6765014881 = 40.59008929 cL/h
60 imperial quart per weeks = 40.59008929 centiliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 0.0676501488 cL/h |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 0.6765014881 cL/h |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 6.765014881 cL/h |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 40.59008929 cL/h |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 67.65014881 cL/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 676.5014881 cL/h |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
0.6765014881 cL/h × 1.478193349 = 1 imp qt/wk
0.6765014881 centiliter per hours = 1 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = centiliter per hours × 1.47819334857
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per hours are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.6765014881 centiliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to centiliter per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 0.6765014881. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per hours back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per hours equals 1.478193349 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to centiliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and centiliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.6765014881 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.