Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — imp qt/wk to cm3/h
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 6.765014881 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Imperial quart per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 6.76501488095
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 6.76501488095.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 6.765014881 = 6.765014881 cm3/h
1 imperial quart per weeks = 6.765014881 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 6.765014881 = 405.9008929 cm3/h
60 imperial quart per weeks = 405.9008929 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 0.6765014881 cm3/h |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 6.765014881 cm3/h |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 67.65014881 cm3/h |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 405.9008929 cm3/h |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 676.5014881 cm3/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 6,765.014881 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
6.765014881 cm3/h × 0.1478193349 = 1 imp qt/wk
6.765014881 cubic centimeter per hours = 1 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.147819334857
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 6.765014881 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 6.765014881. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.1478193349 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6.765014881 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.