Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic foot per Days Converter — imp qt/wk to ft3/d
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0057337019 cubic foot per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic foot per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 3.2774128e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic foot per Days
Imperial quart per Weeks and Cubic foot per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per days = imperial quart per weeks × 0.00573370190128
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 cubic foot per days equals 3.277413e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-cubic foot per days factor of 0.00573370190128.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 0.005733701901 = 0.0057337019 ft3/d
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0057337019 cubic foot per days.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 0.005733701901 = 0.3440221141 ft3/d
60 imperial quart per weeks = 0.3440221141 cubic foot per days.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 0.0005733702 ft3/d |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 0.0057337019 ft3/d |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 0.057337019 ft3/d |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 0.3440221141 ft3/d |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 0.5733701901 ft3/d |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 5.733701901 ft3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks
0.0057337019 ft3/d × 174.4073929 = 0.9999999998 imp qt/wk
0.0057337019 cubic foot per days = 0.9999999998 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = cubic foot per days × 174.407392853
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per days are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0057337019 cubic foot per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to cubic foot per days?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 0.005733701901. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per days back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per days equals 174.4073929 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per days?
Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to cubic foot per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and cubic foot per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.005733701901 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.