Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic foot per Hours Converter — imp qt/wk to ft3/h
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0002389042 cubic foot per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic foot per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 7.86579072e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic foot per Hours
Imperial quart per Weeks and Cubic foot per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 0.000238904245887
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-cubic foot per hours factor of 0.000238904245887.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 0.0002389042459 = 0.0002389042 ft3/h
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0002389042 cubic foot per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 0.0002389042459 = 0.0143342548 ft3/h
60 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0143342548 cubic foot per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 0.0000238904 ft3/h |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 0.0002389042 ft3/h |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 0.0023890425 ft3/h |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 0.0143342548 ft3/h |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 0.0238904246 ft3/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 0.2389042459 ft3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
0.0002389042 ft3/h × 4185.777428 = 0.9999998079 imp qt/wk
0.0002389042 cubic foot per hours = 0.9999998079 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = cubic foot per hours × 4185.77742848
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per hours are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0002389042 cubic foot per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to cubic foot per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 0.0002389042459. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 4,185.777428 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to cubic foot per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and cubic foot per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0002389042459 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.