Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Kiloliter per Minutes Converter — imp qt/wk to kL/min
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 1.127502e-7 kiloliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Kiloliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 0.01666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Kiloliter per Minutes
Imperial quart per Weeks and Kiloliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
kiloliter per minutes = imperial quart per weeks × 1.127502e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 kiloliter per minutes equals 0.0166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-kiloliter per minutes factor of 1.127502e-7.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 1.127502e-7 = 1.127502e-7 kL/min
1 imperial quart per weeks = 1.127502e-7 kiloliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 1.127502e-7 = 0.000006765 kL/min
60 imperial quart per weeks = 0.000006765 kiloliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 1.127502e-8 kL/min |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 1.127502e-7 kL/min |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 0.0000011275 kL/min |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 0.000006765 kL/min |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 0.000011275 kL/min |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 0.0001127502 kL/min |
Reverse conversion: Kiloliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks
1.127502e-7 kL/min × 8869160.091 = 0.9999995741 imp qt/wk
1.127502e-7 kiloliter per minutes = 0.9999995741 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = kiloliter per minutes × 8869160.09142
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Kiloliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many kiloliter per minutes are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.127502e-7 kiloliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to kiloliter per minutes?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 1.127502e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert kiloliter per minutes back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 kiloliter per minutes equals 8,869,160.091 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a kiloliter per minutes?
Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to kiloliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and kiloliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.127502e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.