Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Megaliter per Seconds Converter — imp qt/wk to ML/s
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 1.879171e-12 megaliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Megaliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Megaliter per Seconds
Imperial quart per Weeks and Megaliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliter per seconds = imperial quart per weeks × 1.879171e-12
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 megaliter per seconds equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-megaliter per seconds factor of 1.879171e-12.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 1.879171e-12 = 1.879171e-12 ML/s
1 imperial quart per weeks = 1.879171e-12 megaliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 1.879171e-12 = 1.127502e-10 ML/s
60 imperial quart per weeks = 1.127502e-10 megaliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 1.879171e-13 ML/s |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 1.879171e-12 ML/s |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 1.879171e-11 ML/s |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 1.127502e-10 ML/s |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 1.879171e-10 ML/s |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 1.879171e-9 ML/s |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks
1.879171e-12 ML/s × 532149605500 = 1.000000106 imp qt/wk
1.879171e-12 megaliter per seconds = 1.000000106 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = megaliter per seconds × 532149605485
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliter per seconds are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-12 megaliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to megaliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 1.879171e-12. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per seconds back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per seconds equals 532,149,605,500 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per seconds?
Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to megaliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and megaliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.879171e-12 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.