Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Days Converter — imp qt/wk to mL/d
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Milliliter per Days (mL/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 162.3603571 milliliter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 1.15740741e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Days
Imperial quart per Weeks and Milliliter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per days = imperial quart per weeks × 162.360357143
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 milliliter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-milliliter per days factor of 162.360357143.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 162.3603571 = 162.3603571 mL/d
1 imperial quart per weeks = 162.3603571 milliliter per days.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 162.3603571 = 9,741.621429 mL/d
60 imperial quart per weeks = 9,741.621429 milliliter per days.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Milliliter per Days (mL/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 16.23603571 mL/d |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 162.3603571 mL/d |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 1,623.603571 mL/d |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 9,741.621429 mL/d |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 16,236.03571 mL/d |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 162,360.3571 mL/d |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks
162.3603571 mL/d × 0.006159138952 = 0.9999999997 imp qt/wk
162.3603571 milliliter per days = 0.9999999997 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = milliliter per days × 0.00615913895237
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Days (mL/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per days are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 162.3603571 milliliter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to milliliter per days?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 162.3603571. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per days back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per days equals 0.006159139 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per days?
Milliliter per Days (mL/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to milliliter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and milliliter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 162.3603571 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.