Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Years to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — imp qt/yr to ft3/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Years (imp qt/yr) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per years = 0.0007692188 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Years to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.60149643e-11 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Years to Cubic foot per Weeks
Imperial quart per Years and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = imperial quart per years × 0.000769218787964
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per years equals 3.601496e-11 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per years-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 0.000769218787964.
Simple example
1 imp qt/yr × 0.000769218788 = 0.0007692188 ft3/wk
1 imperial quart per years = 0.0007692188 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/yr × 0.000769218788 = 0.0461531273 ft3/wk
60 imperial quart per years = 0.0461531273 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Years (imp qt/yr) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/yr | 0.0000769219 ft3/wk |
| 1 imp qt/yr | 0.0007692188 ft3/wk |
| 10 imp qt/yr | 0.0076921879 ft3/wk |
| 60 imp qt/yr | 0.0461531273 ft3/wk |
| 100 imp qt/yr | 0.0769218788 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/yr | 0.769218788 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Years
0.0007692188 ft3/wk × 1300.020249 = 1.000000016 imp qt/yr
0.0007692188 cubic foot per weeks = 1.000000016 imperial quart per years.
imperial quart per years = cubic foot per weeks × 1300.02024866
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Years.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Years (imp qt/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per years?
1 imperial quart per years equals 0.0007692188 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per years to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per years value by 0.000769218788. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to imperial quart per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 1,300.020249 imperial quart per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per years?
Imperial quart per Years (imp qt/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per years to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per years and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000769218788 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.