Volumetric flow rate.
Quart per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — qt/decade to mm3/min
Convert Quart per Decades (qt/decade) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per decades = 0.1799323862 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quart per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.9988731e-12 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quart per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Quart per Decades and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = quart per decades × 0.179932386246
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per decades equals 2.998873e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per decades-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 0.179932386246.
Simple example
1 qt/decade × 0.1799323862 = 0.1799323862 mm3/min
1 quart per decades = 0.1799323862 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 qt/decade × 0.1799323862 = 10.79594317 mm3/min
60 quart per decades = 10.79594317 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Quart per Decades (qt/decade) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/decade | 0.0179932386 mm3/min |
| 1 qt/decade | 0.1799323862 mm3/min |
| 10 qt/decade | 1.799323862 mm3/min |
| 60 qt/decade | 10.79594317 mm3/min |
| 100 qt/decade | 17.99323862 mm3/min |
| 1,000 qt/decade | 179.9323862 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Quart per Decades
0.1799323862 mm3/min × 5.557643184 = 0.9999999997 qt/decade
0.1799323862 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.9999999997 quart per decades.
quart per decades = cubic millimeter per minutes × 5.55764318401
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Quart per Decades.
Understanding the Quart per Decades (qt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 quart per decades?
1 quart per decades equals 0.1799323862 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per decades to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the quart per decades value by 0.1799323862. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to quart per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 5.557643184 quart per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per decades?
Quart per Decades (qt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per decades to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per decades and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1799323862 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.