Volumetric flow rate.
Quart per Decades to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — qt/decade to imp qt/wk
Convert Quart per Decades (qt/decade) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per decades = 0.0015958491 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quart per Decades to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.9988731e-12 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quart per Decades to Imperial quart per Weeks
Quart per Decades and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = quart per decades × 0.00159584913924
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per decades equals 2.998873e-12 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per decades-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 0.00159584913924.
Simple example
1 qt/decade × 0.001595849139 = 0.0015958491 imp qt/wk
1 quart per decades = 0.0015958491 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 qt/decade × 0.001595849139 = 0.0957509484 imp qt/wk
60 quart per decades = 0.0957509484 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Quart per Decades (qt/decade) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/decade | 0.0001595849 imp qt/wk |
| 1 qt/decade | 0.0015958491 imp qt/wk |
| 10 qt/decade | 0.0159584914 imp qt/wk |
| 60 qt/decade | 0.0957509484 imp qt/wk |
| 100 qt/decade | 0.1595849139 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 qt/decade | 1.595849139 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Quart per Decades
0.0015958491 imp qt/wk × 626.6256474 = 0.9999999754 qt/decade
0.0015958491 imperial quart per weeks = 0.9999999754 quart per decades.
quart per decades = imperial quart per weeks × 626.62564738
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Quart per Decades.
Understanding the Quart per Decades (qt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 quart per decades?
1 quart per decades equals 0.0015958491 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per decades to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the quart per decades value by 0.001595849139. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to quart per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 626.6256474 quart per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per decades?
Quart per Decades (qt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per decades to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per decades and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001595849139 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.