Volumetric flow rate.
Quarts per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — qt/fn to mm3/s
Convert Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per fortnight = 0.7823685069 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quarts per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.82368507e-10 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quarts per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Quart per Fortnight and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = quarts per fortnight × 0.782368506944
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per fortnight equals 7.823685e-10 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per fortnight-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.782368506944.
Simple example
1 qt/fn × 0.7823685069 = 0.7823685069 mm3/s
1 quart per fortnight = 0.7823685069 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 qt/fn × 0.7823685069 = 46.94211042 mm3/s
60 quarts per fortnight = 46.94211042 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/fn | 0.0782368507 mm3/s |
| 1 qt/fn | 0.7823685069 mm3/s |
| 10 qt/fn | 7.823685069 mm3/s |
| 60 qt/fn | 46.94211042 mm3/s |
| 100 qt/fn | 78.23685069 mm3/s |
| 1,000 qt/fn | 782.3685069 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Quart per Fortnight
0.7823685069 mm3/s × 1.278170058 = 0.9999999999 qt/fn
0.7823685069 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.9999999999 quarts per fortnight.
quarts per fortnight = cubic millimeter per seconds × 1.27817005813
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Quart per Fortnight.
Understanding the Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 quart per fortnight?
1 quart per fortnight equals 0.7823685069 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per fortnight to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the quart per fortnight value by 0.7823685069. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to quart per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1.278170058 quarts per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per fortnight?
Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per fortnight to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per fortnight and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.7823685069 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.