Volumetric flow rate.
Quarts per Fortnight to Microliters per Millisecond Converter — qt/fn to uL/ms
Convert Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) to Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per fortnight = 0.0007823685 microliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quarts per Fortnight to Microliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.82368507e-10 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quarts per Fortnight to Microliters per Millisecond
Quart per Fortnight and Microliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliters per millisecond = quarts per fortnight × 0.000782368506944
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per fortnight equals 7.823685e-10 base units, and 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per fortnight-to-microliter per millisecond factor of 0.000782368506944.
Simple example
1 qt/fn × 0.0007823685069 = 0.0007823685 uL/ms
1 quart per fortnight = 0.0007823685 microliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 qt/fn × 0.0007823685069 = 0.0469421104 uL/ms
60 quarts per fortnight = 0.0469421104 microliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) | Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/fn | 0.0000782369 uL/ms |
| 1 qt/fn | 0.0007823685 uL/ms |
| 10 qt/fn | 0.0078236851 uL/ms |
| 60 qt/fn | 0.0469421104 uL/ms |
| 100 qt/fn | 0.0782368507 uL/ms |
| 1,000 qt/fn | 0.7823685069 uL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Millisecond to Quart per Fortnight
0.0007823685 uL/ms × 1278.170058 = 0.9999999911 qt/fn
0.0007823685 microliters per millisecond = 0.9999999911 quarts per fortnight.
quarts per fortnight = microliters per millisecond × 1278.17005813
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Millisecond to Quart per Fortnight.
Understanding the Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliters per millisecond are in 1 quart per fortnight?
1 quart per fortnight equals 0.0007823685 microliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per fortnight to microliter per millisecond?
Multiply the quart per fortnight value by 0.0007823685069. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond back to quart per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 1,278.170058 quarts per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per fortnight?
Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per fortnight to microliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per fortnight and microliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0007823685069 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.