Volumetric flow rate.
Quart per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — qt/h to cm3/ms
Convert Quart per Hours (qt/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per hours = 0.0002628758 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quart per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.62875818e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quart per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Quart per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = quart per hours × 0.000262875818333
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per hours equals 2.628758e-7 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per hours-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.000262875818333.
Simple example
1 qt/h × 0.0002628758183 = 0.0002628758 cm3/ms
1 quart per hours = 0.0002628758 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 qt/h × 0.0002628758183 = 0.0157725491 cm3/ms
60 quart per hours = 0.0157725491 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Quart per Hours (qt/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/h | 0.0000262876 cm3/ms |
| 1 qt/h | 0.0002628758 cm3/ms |
| 10 qt/h | 0.0026287582 cm3/ms |
| 60 qt/h | 0.0157725491 cm3/ms |
| 100 qt/h | 0.0262875818 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 qt/h | 0.2628758183 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Quart per Hours
0.0002628758 cm3/ms × 3804.077554 = 0.9999999303 qt/h
0.0002628758 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 0.9999999303 quart per hours.
quart per hours = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 3804.07755396
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Quart per Hours.
Understanding the Quart per Hours (qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 quart per hours?
1 quart per hours equals 0.0002628758 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the quart per hours value by 0.0002628758183. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 3,804.077554 quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per hours?
Quart per Hours (qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per hours and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0002628758183 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.