Volumetric flow rate.
Quarts per Millisecond to Milliliters per Fortnight Converter — qt/ms to mL/fn
Convert Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) to Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per millisecond = 1.144709e+12 milliliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quarts per Millisecond to Milliliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.946352946 / 8.26719577e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quarts per Millisecond to Milliliters per Fortnight
Quart per Millisecond and Milliliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per fortnight = quarts per millisecond × 1.144709e+12
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per millisecond equals 0.946352946 base units, and 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per millisecond-to-milliliter per fortnight factor of 1.144709e+12.
Simple example
1 qt/ms × 1.144709e+12 = 1.144709e+12 mL/fn
1 quart per millisecond = 1.144709e+12 milliliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 qt/ms × 1.144709e+12 = 6.868251e+13 mL/fn
60 quarts per millisecond = 6.868251e+13 milliliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) | Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/ms | 114,470,852,300 mL/fn |
| 1 qt/ms | 1.144709e+12 mL/fn |
| 10 qt/ms | 1.144709e+13 mL/fn |
| 60 qt/ms | 6.868251e+13 mL/fn |
| 100 qt/ms | 1.144709e+14 mL/fn |
| 1,000 qt/ms | 1.144709e+15 mL/fn |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Fortnight to Quart per Millisecond
1.144709e+12 mL/fn × 8.735848e-13 = 1.000000416 qt/ms
1.144709e+12 milliliters per fortnight = 1.000000416 quarts per millisecond.
quarts per millisecond = milliliters per fortnight × 8.735848e-13
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Fortnight to Quart per Millisecond.
Understanding the Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per fortnight are in 1 quart per millisecond?
1 quart per millisecond equals 1.144709e+12 milliliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per millisecond to milliliter per fortnight?
Multiply the quart per millisecond value by 1.144709e+12. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight back to quart per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.735848e-13 quarts per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per millisecond?
Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per millisecond to milliliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per millisecond and milliliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.144709e+12 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.