Volumetric flow rate.
Quart per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — qt/s to cm3/wk
Convert Quart per Seconds (qt/s) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per seconds = 572,354,261.7 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quart per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.000946352946 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quart per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Quart per Seconds and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = quart per seconds × 572354261.741
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per seconds equals 0.000946352946 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per seconds-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 572354261.741.
Simple example
1 qt/s × 572354261.7 = 572,354,261.7 cm3/wk
1 quart per seconds = 572,354,261.7 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 qt/s × 572354261.7 = 34,341,255,700 cm3/wk
60 quart per seconds = 34,341,255,700 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Quart per Seconds (qt/s) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/s | 57,235,426.17 cm3/wk |
| 1 qt/s | 572,354,261.7 cm3/wk |
| 10 qt/s | 5,723,542,617 cm3/wk |
| 60 qt/s | 34,341,255,700 cm3/wk |
| 100 qt/s | 57,235,426,170 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 qt/s | 572,354,261,700 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quart per Seconds
1 cm3/wk × 1.74717e-9 = 1.74717e-9 qt/s
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 1.74717e-9 quart per seconds.
quart per seconds = cubic centimeter per weeks × 1.74717e-9
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Quart per Seconds (qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 quart per seconds?
1 quart per seconds equals 572,354,261.7 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the quart per seconds value by 572354261.7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.74717e-9 quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per seconds?
Quart per Seconds (qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per seconds and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 572354261.7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.