Volumetric flow rate.
Quart per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — qt/wk to mm3/ms
Convert Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per weeks = 0.001564737 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quart per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.56473701e-9 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quart per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Quart per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = quart per weeks × 0.00156473701389
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.00156473701389.
Simple example
1 qt/wk × 0.001564737014 = 0.001564737 mm3/ms
1 quart per weeks = 0.001564737 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 qt/wk × 0.001564737014 = 0.0938842208 mm3/ms
60 quart per weeks = 0.0938842208 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/wk | 0.0001564737 mm3/ms |
| 1 qt/wk | 0.001564737 mm3/ms |
| 10 qt/wk | 0.0156473701 mm3/ms |
| 60 qt/wk | 0.0938842208 mm3/ms |
| 100 qt/wk | 0.1564737014 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 qt/wk | 1.564737014 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks
0.001564737 mm3/ms × 639.0850291 = 0.9999999911 qt/wk
0.001564737 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 0.9999999911 quart per weeks.
quart per weeks = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 639.085029065
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 quart per weeks?
1 quart per weeks equals 0.001564737 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the quart per weeks value by 0.001564737014. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 639.0850291 quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per weeks?
Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per weeks and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001564737014 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.