Quart per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — qt/wk to imp pt/h

Convert Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per weeks = 0.0099127879 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Quart per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 quart per weeks = 0.0099127879 imperial pint per hours
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.56473701e-9 / 1.57850347e-7.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Quart per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours

Quart per Weeks and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

imperial pint per hours = quart per weeks × 0.00991278791225

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per weeks-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 0.00991278791225.

Simple example

1 qt/wk × 0.009912787912 = 0.0099127879 imp pt/h

1 quart per weeks = 0.0099127879 imperial pint per hours.

Real-world example

60 qt/wk × 0.009912787912 = 0.5947672747 imp pt/h

60 quart per weeks = 0.5947672747 imperial pint per hours.

Conversion table

Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
0.1 qt/wk0.0009912788 imp pt/h
1 qt/wk0.0099127879 imp pt/h
10 qt/wk0.0991278791 imp pt/h
60 qt/wk0.5947672747 imp pt/h
100 qt/wk0.9912787912 imp pt/h
1,000 qt/wk9.912787912 imp pt/h

Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Quart per Weeks

0.0099127879 imp pt/h × 100.8797937 = 0.9999999988 qt/wk

0.0099127879 imperial pint per hours = 0.9999999988 quart per weeks.

quart per weeks = imperial pint per hours × 100.879793742

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Quart per Weeks.

Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 quart per weeks?

1 quart per weeks equals 0.0099127879 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert quart per weeks to imperial pint per hours?

Multiply the quart per weeks value by 0.009912787912. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to quart per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 100.8797937 quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a quart per weeks?

Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a imperial pint per hours?

Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the quart per weeks to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?

Yes. Both quart per weeks and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.009912787912 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.