Volumetric flow rate.
Tablespoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — tbsp/wk to mm3/min
Convert Tablespoon per Weeks (tbsp/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 tablespoon per weeks = 1.466940951 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Tablespoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.44490158e-11 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Tablespoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Tablespoon per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = tablespoon per weeks × 1.46694095052
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 tablespoon per weeks equals 2.444902e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct tablespoon per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 1.46694095052.
Simple example
1 tbsp/wk × 1.466940951 = 1.466940951 mm3/min
1 tablespoon per weeks = 1.466940951 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 tbsp/wk × 1.466940951 = 88.01645703 mm3/min
60 tablespoon per weeks = 88.01645703 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Tablespoon per Weeks (tbsp/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tbsp/wk | 0.1466940951 mm3/min |
| 1 tbsp/wk | 1.466940951 mm3/min |
| 10 tbsp/wk | 14.66940951 mm3/min |
| 60 tbsp/wk | 88.01645703 mm3/min |
| 100 tbsp/wk | 146.6940951 mm3/min |
| 1,000 tbsp/wk | 1,466.940951 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Tablespoon per Weeks
1.466940951 mm3/min × 0.6816906977 = 1 tbsp/wk
1.466940951 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1 tablespoon per weeks.
tablespoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.681690697669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Tablespoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Tablespoon per Weeks (tbsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 tablespoon per weeks?
1 tablespoon per weeks equals 1.466940951 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert tablespoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the tablespoon per weeks value by 1.466940951. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to tablespoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.6816906977 tablespoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a tablespoon per weeks?
Tablespoon per Weeks (tbsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the tablespoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both tablespoon per weeks and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.466940951 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.