Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/d to cm3/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per days = 35 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.78703704e-11 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Days and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = metric teaspoon per days × 35
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 5.787037e-11 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per days-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 35.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/d × 35 = 35 cm3/wk
1 metric teaspoon per days = 35 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/d × 35 = 2,100 cm3/wk
60 metric teaspoon per days = 2,100 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/d | 3.5 cm3/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/d | 35 cm3/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/d | 350 cm3/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/d | 2,100 cm3/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/d | 3,500 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/d | 35,000 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days
35 cm3/wk × 0.02857142857 = 1 metric tsp/d
35 cubic centimeter per weeks = 1 metric teaspoon per days.
metric teaspoon per days = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.0285714285714
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per days?
1 metric teaspoon per days equals 35 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per days to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per days value by 35. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to metric teaspoon per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0285714286 metric teaspoon per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per days?
Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per days to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per days and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 35 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.